One of the most controversial Confederate monuments is the massive one at Arlington National Cemetery outside of Washington D.C. For nearly a decade calls for its removal have been growing. Arlington Cemetery was established for Union soldiers who died fighting the Confederacy and the decision a half-century after the war to memorialize the Confederates was opposed by both African Americans and many surviving Union veterans. Even descendents of the sculptor responsible for crafting the monument petitioned to have it removed. The Washington Post reports that the Pentagon will remove the statue, but what will be done with it is still up in the air. Here are substantial excerpts from today’s article:
For 108 years, a massive bronze statue hailing the glory of the South has stood sentry over Confederate war dead buried in Arlington National Cemetery. Soon it will be dismantled on orders from the Pentagon, but then planners will face a quandary: what to do with a disgraced monument that some say may still have a historical lesson to impart.
The Defense Department’s directive, included within an extensive mandate to strip away all remaining attachment to the Confederacy, is stark and vague. The statue is to be taken down, it says, its bronze features removed, and the Department of the Army, which manages Arlington, should find “the most cost-effective method” for disposal. While an advisory committee has identified some options — storing away the 22 main components, trashing the memorial entirely, or donating it to another organization or museum — thus far, no consensus has emerged….
At a virtual public meeting of the cemetery’s advisory panel last month, one committee member asked if the memorial could be returned to the United Daughters of the Confederacy, which commissioned it decades ago. “It is obviously one of the options that could be pursued,” Renea C. Yates, director of the Office of Army Cemeteries, responded.
Multiple members of the panel sounded frustrated that the monument’s fate had been decided without their input, and suggested it could be stored and someday brought back for exhibition as a historical artifact. More than 20 descendants of the sculptor, Moses Ezekiel, have already objected to such a notion, demanding the statue’s removal as far back as 2017 and calling it a “relic of a racist past.”
Stephen Carney, the cemetery’s command historian, told the committee about a previous plan Arlington National Cemetery’s staff had envisioned, involving a “semitransparent” viewing panel that would, in a sense, transport visitors back in time.
“Looking through it,” he said, “you would see the memorial as it stood.”
The advisory committee won’t be making any decisions alone. It is required by the National Historic Preservation Act to seek the public’s input, a process that will conclude next year. Already, 300 written comments have been submitted in response to a call-out in the Federal Register, and at least a dozen people have asked to address the committee in person.
A spokesman for the cemetery, John David Harlow, said a vote on the matter has not yet been scheduled.
The cemetery, with its arresting views of the D.C. skyline, is just across the Potomac River in Virginia. Originally a plantation belonging to descendants of Martha Custis Washington, including Confederate general Robert E. Lee, the land that would become the cemetery was acquired by the U.S. Army in 1861 and designated as a settlement for freed people two years later. Arlington became a national cemetery in 1864, but the southern part of the land remained a “Freedman’s Village” until 1900.
Completed in 1914, the sculpture depicts two false tropes common to the Lost Cause effort to romanticize Southern defeat in the Civil War: a weeping Black woman — a “mammy,” according to the cemetery — holding the baby of a White Confederate officer, and an enslaved man accompanying his enslaver into battle. In the past five years, cemetery caretakers have acknowledged the intentionally misleading imagery with interpretive efforts, including signage at the site and a webpage that explains how the memorial was part of a larger attempt to gloss over the evils of slavery….
United Daughters of the Confederacy, which maintains a headquarters in Richmond, has condemned the use of Confederate memorials to advance “racial divisiveness or white supremacy,” the group’s president general, Jinny Widowski, wrote in a statement posted on its homepage. The organization nevertheless opposes the removal of such memorials from public spaces. It did not respond to a request for comment.
“I don’t see it as belonging to the UDC as much as some people might,” Foster said, noting that the memorial was financed through a fundraising campaign that extended beyond the organization. “On the other hand, I think if there is a museum where it can go and be properly contextualized, it’s a splendid example of the South’s attempt to vindicate slavery and secession, and can help people teach that.”
…Foster’s proposal: Find a museum with space to accommodate Arlington’s Confederate Memorial indoors, where it can be interpreted with care. The city of Richmond, which in December completed a two-year, $1.8 million project to remove statues honoring Confederate generals, has taken this course, transferring them to the Black History Museum and Cultural Center of Virginia.
“Making them part of the landscape is what gives them their power,” Foster said. “Where if you’re in a museum, you’re saying, ‘This is the past that we’re looking at. Not something that we celebrate in the present.’”
Follow Reconstruction Blog on Social Media:
I find it strange that with all the hate directed toward the South having slaves that there have been no calls to have Washington and Jefferson’s images taken of Mount Rushmore as they had slaves and it was said that Jefferson fathered a son to his slave although no DNA proof can be obtained. Lincoln said I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermingling with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior. I am as much as any other man in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.
Why then the double standard?? If we were to be fair they should have made new money made without their images on them and have the Lincoln memorial removed. BTW the supreme court ruled in 1959 that confederate soldiers were veterans.
Can you please post the citation for the Supreme Court decision you refer to. Even the name would allow me to review it.
Considering that Arlington was Lee’s home and was chosen as the cemetery.. “veterans”? I wonder if Vietnam has memorials to thier former-Southern enemies?
America ought to look at the manner in which other countries have engaged and sought to process their inter-border conflicts, such as Ireland.
I will come back to this with a longer reply when I’ve the opportunity.